Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k,net.news.group,net.micro.6809
Subject: Re: Can the OS-9 traffic move out of net.micro.68K?
Message-ID: <922@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Nov-85 21:27:20 EST
Article-I.D.: lsuc.922
Posted: Fri Nov 15 21:27:20 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 15-Nov-85 21:46:28 EST
References: <5100002@umn-cs.UUCP> <257@l5.uucp> <1213@cbdkc1.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Organization: Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
Lines: 27
Xref: lsuc net.micro.68k:307 net.news.group:1870 net.micro.6809:128
Summary: A more serious response.


     My last response on this question was deliberately inflamatory
and quite frankly a bit for the sake of fun.  Seriously, as I understand
it, a new 'net' group would have to have a 'moderator' who is willing
to accumulate all the info.  The decision to have a new net before
someone comes forward to volunteer their services seems backwards to
me.  Am I wrong in my understanding of the situation?

     Otherwise, I don't really mind the idea.  I *do* however, feel that
those of you who simply ignore OS-9 out of hand (out of ignorance)
rate your knowledge of 6809 or 680xx higher than you should.  Would you
appreciate my legal advice on a matter of importance if I only knew
one aspect of it and was totally ignorant of the central legal issues?
How many here are or will be in a position to advise people as to system
development and/or purchase and will simply be parroting what they know
about their little world?  Believe it or not, I actually *like* hearing
about *all* other systems.  How many of you like to call yourselves
"professionals"?

                                             Cheers! -- Jim O.

-- 
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura
Compuserve: 72205,541
MTS at WU: GKL6