Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ISM780B.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!amd!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!decvax!cca!ISM780B!tim
From: tim@ISM780B.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Re: Amiga MMU question
Message-ID: <39700002@ISM780B.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Nov-85 18:58:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ISM780B.39700002
Posted: Fri Nov  8 18:58:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Nov-85 07:49:32 EST
References: <397@aum.UUCP>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:aum:-39700:ISM780B:39700002:000:403
Nf-From: ISM780B!tim    Nov  8 18:58:00 1985


This is where the 80386 is going to win big.  Unless the hardware guys are
real perverse, it will be impossible to make a 386 based system that can't
support a real multi-user multi-tasking _safe_ operating system.

About the only thing they could do is provide a fragmented phyisical
address space, where the fragments are smaller than 4k.  Of course,
someone will probably take this as a challenge...