Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ISM780B.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!bbnccv!ISM780B!tim
From: tim@ISM780B.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: In the cause of Science .....
Message-ID: <39700005@ISM780B.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Nov-85 19:10:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ISM780B.39700005
Posted: Fri Nov 15 19:10:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Nov-85 22:09:48 EST
References: <663@ecsvax.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:ecsvax:-66300:ISM780B:39700005:000:611
Nf-From: ISM780B!tim    Nov 15 19:10:00 1985


/* Written  7:03 pm  Nov 13, 1985 by dale@amiga in net.micro.amig */

available.  I can collaborate you lattice-c experience, mine came in at
around 450/sec. However running the exact same code through the greenhills
compiler that is on the sun for cross development not only produced more
compact code but also turned a figure of 850 dhrystones/sec.
These both are 32bit integer compilers.  Let's here for optimizing
compilers!!!

/* End of text from ISM780B:net.micro.amig */

While the Green Hills compilers are good, I think these results say more
about the Lattic C compiler than the Green Hills compiler.