Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter
From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: AMIGA DEVELOPMENT KIT UPDATE: SORRY
Message-ID: <456@graffiti.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 21-Nov-85 22:56:48 EST
Article-I.D.: graffiti.456
Posted: Thu Nov 21 22:56:48 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 23-Nov-85 11:03:09 EST
References: <39700003@ISM780B.UUCP> <1057@druxo.UUCP>
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 17

> Point taken, but a development organization is not necessarily a marketing
> organization, nor does it need to be.  One can always (with a sufficiently
> developed product) get a company with marketing experience and clout 
> (financially speaking, of course) to pick up your product as part of their
> line.  Quit a few small software developers/companies work this way.

Yeh! Anybody remember Leor Zolman? Where would BDS-C be if DRI refused to
sell the CP/M assembler to anyone but an "established developer"? At the
very least the assembler should have been bundled with the machine, along
with enough docs to use it. $450 is probably close to the best deal they could
cut for Lattice 'C', but an assembler is an entirely different kettle of
fiche. You listening, AMIGA?
-- 
Name: Peter da Silva
Graphic: `-_-'
UUCP: ...!shell!{graffiti,baylor}!peter
IAEF: ...!kitty!baylor!peter