Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site wlbr.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!nsc!voder!wlbr!steve
From: steve@wlbr.UUCP (Steve Childress)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Memory
Message-ID: <390@wlbr.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Dec-85 20:44:01 EST
Article-I.D.: wlbr.390
Posted: Mon Dec  2 20:44:01 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 5-Dec-85 05:49:21 EST
References: <7801@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: Eaton IMS, Westlake Village, CA
Lines: 22
Summary: Oh no, Mr. Bill -- 32K constraints!

In article <7801@ucla-cs.ARPA>, cc1@ucla-cs.UUCP writes:
> Did you say that this wonderful 512K to 8 meg system Can't Give Out MORE THAN
> 32K AT A TIME?
>  
> <FLAME ON>
> WHAT IS THIS? Aren't you aware that this is STUPID? HAven't you seen the
> troubles people have with 64K segment pc's? (no brand mentioned, but you
> should know). And now you limit it to 32 Bleeping Kay?
> <Flame off>
> 			Michael Gersten

My gosh ... the !@@#$&**$ segmentation in the 80xx micros is why I aligned
with Amiga ... I've fought the Intel chip 64K follies for too many hours.
You Sun-using developers have gotta be sensitive to the frustrations of
those of us who are intolerant of 16 bit technologies like the 808x's.

Don't do this to us! Hopefully the original flame was in error.

		Regards,
			Steve Childress
			{trwrb, scgvaxd, ihnp4, voder, vortex} !wlbr!steve
		        or	 		        ...wlbr!wlbreng1!steve