Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site tetra.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!lll-crg!ucdavis!ucbvax!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!noscvax!tetra!jtjones
From: jtjones@tetra.UUCP (Jeffrey T. Jones)
Newsgroups: net.micro.apple
Subject: Re: prodos on an apple ][+ (old question
Message-ID: <115@tetra.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Nov-85 10:25:08 EST
Article-I.D.: tetra.115
Posted: Tue Nov 26 10:25:08 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Nov-85 08:44:17 EST
References: <46@<2a3bb0e3.UUCP> <11700007@ism70.UUCP>
Reply-To: jtjones@tetra.UUCP (Jeffrey T. Jones)
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego
Lines: 22

In article <11700007@ism70.UUCP> josh@ism70.UUCP writes:
>
>response to ][+ question.....answer is no a very positive no only
>][e and ][c can operate prodos your friend will have to settle
>for good old dos 3.3 any other questions on prodos let me know

HORSE FEATHERS!!!  As I already stated in a previous message to the net,
I AM running ProDOS on my ][+ w/64K!!  Or actually I can run it.  (I still 
prefer DOS 3.3)

Please don't spread misinformation.  It's tough enough for a person when
they ask a question like this, and then get two totally conflicting answers.


-- 
Any opinions expressed above are soley my own and have NO connection with the
thoughts of NOSC, NAVELEX, or the U.S. Government to the above subject.
--
Jeffrey T. Jones                                Naval Ocean Systems Center   
                                                Code 811 - VHSIC Project Office
jtjones@nosc.ARPA                               San Diego, CA  92152
{ihnp4,decvax,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!noscvax!jtjones   (619) 225-7815/6143