Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc13.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!amd!amdcad!decwrl!pyramid!gould9!ncr-sd!sdcc6!sdcc3!sdcc13!33500911
From: 33500911@sdcc13.UUCP ({|lit})
Newsgroups: net.micro.apple
Subject: Re: prodos on an apple ][+ (old question)
Message-ID: <374@sdcc13.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Nov-85 22:22:56 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc13.374
Posted: Tue Nov 26 22:22:56 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Nov-85 10:30:51 EST
References: <46@<2a3bb0e3.UUCP> <11700007@ism70.UUCP> <115@tetra.UUCP>
Reply-To: 33500911@sdcc13.UUCP (James A. Hayes)
Followup-To: net.micro.apple
Distribution: net
Organization: U.C. San Diego Beer & Pizza Society
Lines: 39
Keywords: ProDOS
Summary: Yup.


In article <115@tetra.UUCP> jtjones@tetra.UUCP (Jeffrey T. Jones) writes:
>>
>> response to ][+ question.....answer is no a very positive no only
>> ][e and ][c can operate prodos your friend will have to settle
>> for good old dos 3.3 any other questions on prodos let me know
>
> HORSE FEATHERS!!!  As I already stated in a previous message to the net,
> I AM running ProDOS on my ][+ w/64K!!  Or actually I can run it.  (I still 
> prefer DOS 3.3)
>

As a side note:

	I'm running the latest version of ProDOS on my Apple 
][. (Serial number 18033, circa 1978) It works fine.  No problems
whatsoever. (That is if you have a 16K ramcard & Applesoft)

> Please don't spread misinformation.  It's tough enough for a person when
> they ask a question like this, and then get two totally conflicting answers.
>

The above needs to be said more than once:

> Please don't spread misinformation.  It's tough enough for a person when
> they ask a question like this, and then get two totally conflicting answers.


--
					- Jim Hayes

UUCP:    {ihnp4,decvax,ucbvax, etc.}!sdcsvax!sdcc13
ARPA:    33500911%sdcc13@SDCSVAX.ACC.EDU

"A scientist must also be absolutly like a child.  If he sees a
thing, he must say that he sees it, whether it was what he thought
he was going to see or not.  See first, think later, then test.  But
always see first.  Otherwise you will only see what you were
expecting.  Most scientists forget that." -- John Watson