Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rosevax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!mmm!rosevax!hogan From: hogan@rosevax.UUCP (Andy Hogan) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Net.*.mac still in danger Message-ID: <239@rosevax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Nov-85 16:39:16 EST Article-I.D.: rosevax.239 Posted: Mon Nov 11 16:39:16 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 18-Nov-85 06:39:38 EST Distribution: net Organization: Rosemount Inc., Eden Prairie, MN Lines: 33 In Message <2040@umcp-cs.UUCP>, posted in net.news.group, mangoe@umcp-cs (Charley Wingate) writes: >The following statistics were derived from seismo's top 25 groups numbers: [this list is pared down a bit here and emphasis is added by me] > Group Avg. rank by > Article Size Tot. Traffic >--------------------------------------------- >net.sources.games 22.7 10 >net.sources.mac 14.4 1 *** >net.sources 6.2 2 >net.micro.mac 1.4 4 *** >net.micro.atari 1.2 13 >net.micro.pc 1.1 19 >net.lang.c 1.1 20 >net.unix-wizards 0.8 17 >net.unix 0.8 25 > >One thing that should be evident is that the ~.sources groups have become a >primary service of the net. A major cost of the system is distributing >software for Macs and for games. Notice also how far down the list the >other "technical" groups appear. The ranking of net.*.mac groups is the major reason many of the backbone site administrators are considering dropping these groups. This decision can still be prevented, or at least held to making the sources group a moderated one. Voice your opinion in net.news.group! There has been some defense of the mac groups there, but also a lot of complaints. I for one don't want to see these groups made less useful! -- Andy Hogan Rosemount, Inc. Mpls MN path: ...ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!mmm!rosevax!hogan Working is not a synonym for Quality.