Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!amd!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!decvax!cca!inmet!bhyde
From: bhyde@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac
Subject: Re: Is My Thumb an Indicator?
Message-ID: <26700043@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 9-Nov-85 12:38:00 EST
Article-I.D.: inmet.26700043
Posted: Sat Nov  9 12:38:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Nov-85 01:05:32 EST
References: <1283@wanginst.UUCP>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:wanginst:-128300:inmet:26700043:000:400
Nf-From: inmet!bhyde    Nov  9 12:38:00 1985


It is clearly a design flaw that the action proc of a control
has two different signatures.  My solution to this problem was
to build my own control, which usually just calls thru to the vanilla
control.  Then I use the control defproc calls and avoid the
action proc entirely.  Of course that's still hard to do
if your writing in anything but pascal.  My C version, for
example, requires asm glue.