Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!phillips
From: phillips@reed.UUCP (Patrick Phillips)
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac,net.lang.st80
Subject: Re: Smalltalk for the Mac; (and a memory hint)
Message-ID: <2235@reed.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 5-Dec-85 18:41:15 EST
Article-I.D.: reed.2235
Posted: Thu Dec  5 18:41:15 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Dec-85 05:03:16 EST
References: <248@watmath.UUCP> <4468@apple.UUCP>
Reply-To: phillips@reed.UUCP (Patrick Phillips)
Distribution: net
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon
Lines: 15
Xref: watmath net.micro.mac:3703 net.lang.st80:288

In article <4468@apple.UUCP> mark@apple.UUCP (Mark Lentczner) writes:
>[]
>Being a member of the Smalltalk group at Apple, I was very pleased
>to see the review of our current release of Smalltalk for the Macintosh.
>I need to correct two things with the review however.
>
>    2) The reviewer only had a 512k machine and hence only used level 0
>	of the release.  Level 1, which requires 1 Meg or more, is the
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Let's see, if Apple is developing a product to run on a 1 Meg 
machine, they must be prepared to produce a 1 Meg machine.  Perhaps
this lends more than rumor to the rumors.

	Patrick Phillips (phillips@reed)