Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!nybcb!daly From: daly@nybcb.UUCP (daly) Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: Re: Shift in AIDS risk groups Message-ID: <197@nybcb.UUCP> Date: Mon, 18-Nov-85 14:38:49 EST Article-I.D.: nybcb.197 Posted: Mon Nov 18 14:38:49 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 21-Nov-85 20:33:17 EST Lines: 34 >From cmcl2!harvard!bbnccv!bbncca!rrizzo Thu Nov 14 13:05:13 1985 >Subject: Shift in ADIS risk groups? >Newsgroups: net.motss,net.med > >BTW, here's something a friend in New York recently told me: among >NEW CASES of AIDS in NYC, gay and bisexual cases account for just >over 50%, while the rest are heterosexual (mainly intravenous drug >users and their spouses/lovers/offspring). If true (& my friend's >well-informed), this would represent a nearly 20% drop in gay and >bisexual cases, among NEW case, that is. For years the proportion >of gay/bisexual cases has maintained a steady 70-71%. > >Ron Rizzo Working in the New York Blood Center, I read net.med & net.motss because I'm curious as to what people are saying about AIDS. The above article implies that there is a shift in the AIDS risk group. I just thought I'd share the something with the folks in this group. The Vice-President Of The Greater New York Blood Program gave a lecture on AIDS about a month ago & passed out some literature the Blood Program put together & this is how the stats on risk groups go: As of 9/9/85 there have been 13,074 cases of AIDS reported. Homosexuel/Bisexuel 9482 (73%) Intravenous Drug Users 2189 (16%) Hemophiliacs 98 ( 1%) Heterosexual Contracts of Above Groups 130 ( 1%) Child with parents with AIDS or at risk for AIDS 117 ( 1%) Transfusion with Blood Products 225 ( 2%) None of the Above 883 ( 6%) 883 is a large number to be "None of the above", but what can I say, I didn't prepare the stats. I just figured folks out there might be interested.