Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 Apollo 5/13/85; site apollo.uucp
Path: utzoo!utcsri!ubc-vision!uw-beaver!apollo!rees
From: rees@apollo.uucp (Jim Rees)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: orphans retraction (ritcv is not a bad guy)
Message-ID: <2a2694a5.1de6@apollo.uucp>
Date: Fri, 15-Nov-85 09:40:33 EST
Article-I.D.: apollo.2a2694a5.1de6
Posted: Fri Nov 15 09:40:33 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 16-Nov-85 15:14:32 EST
Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, Mass.
Lines: 7

Michael Lutz has pointed out to me that ritcv does not run notes.
The orphaned response that came from his machine was apparently
a reply to an orphaned response generated on some other machine.

Some of us take the radical view that orphaned responses should be
rejected rather than passed on to other sites.  The sites feeding
ritcv have apparently not taken this view.