Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter
From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: c*nc*l <148@psueea.UUCP> and many others
Message-ID: <441@graffiti.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 16-Nov-85 13:05:37 EST
Article-I.D.: graffiti.441
Posted: Sat Nov 16 13:05:37 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Nov-85 08:02:58 EST
References: <x148@psueea.UUCP> <d39@utastro.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 16

> I don't bother to even read net.sources
> anymore because of the junk and the volume, and I'm sure I'm
> not the only one.  I also don't buy people's arguments about
> net.sources is for "less mature" software which shouldn't be 
> posted to mod.sources.  Hell, I'm *not interested* in less
> mature software which someone just posted without documentation,
> won't unshar, and has more bugs than I'd care to think about.

On the other hand I haven't seen anything in mod.sources in over a
month. Why should I post to mod.sources when I'm certain a lot of
the net will never get my program?
-- 
Name: Peter da Silva
Graphic: `-_-'
UUCP: ...!shell!{graffiti,baylor}!peter
IAEF: ...!kitty!baylor!peter