Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site mtung.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!drutx!mtuxo!mtunh!mtuni!mtunf!mtung!jhc
From: jhc@mtung.UUCP (Jonathan Clark)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: Line Eater ate <431@nicmad.UUCP>
Message-ID: <637@mtung.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Nov-85 11:12:17 EST
Article-I.D.: mtung.637
Posted: Wed Nov 27 11:12:17 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Nov-85 07:48:18 EST
References: <897@ncoast.UUCP> <279@epicen.UUCP>
Reply-To: jhc@mtung.UUCP (Jonathan Clark)
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 16

This article arrived here with nibble marks. Our path was:

Path: mtung!mtunh!vax135!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!brown

Comparing known good and bad paths (from the previous
articles) the guilty party must be one of houxm, whuxl, or
whuxlm (I think we can exclude Mr. Spafford's and Mr
Cleveland's sites from suspicion).  The remaining three are
all BTL sites in NJ. Anyone from HOCC or WHCC care to
comment? I'm fairly sure that houxm is clean, but don't
actually know.
-- 
Jonathan Clark
[NAC]!mtung!jhc

My walk has become rather more silly lately.