Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site mtung.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!drutx!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!jhc
From: jhc@mtung.UUCP (Jonathan Clark)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Speaking of line eaters...
Message-ID: <638@mtung.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Nov-85 12:37:30 EST
Article-I.D.: mtung.638
Posted: Wed Nov 27 12:37:30 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Nov-85 07:48:31 EST
Reply-To: jhc@mtung.UUCP (Jonathan Clark)
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 29

We just received the following article (header edited for
brevity):

>Relay-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mtung.UUCP
>Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site islenet.UUCP
>Path: mtung!mtunh!vax135!houxm!ihnp4!qantel!ptsfa!dual!islenet!tracyw
>From: tracyw@islenet.UUCP (Tracy Walters)
>Newsgroups: net.dcom
>Subject: Re: Protocol Analyzers
>Message-ID: <1873@islenet.UUCP>
>Lines: 5
>
>grams available from Tekelec. It's price is $20k
> Another excellent analyzer but a lot less costly is the Halcyon 803B for $12k.
>onfiguration control (they figure out on their own what the physical and transfer layer protocols are). 
>amming capability, but retails for $20k. Both have auto configuration control. 
>eeds.
>
It looks like the beginnings of each line have been
munched, and possibly the line eater has had a go at it too
(but the line count is good). Some of the lines look too
long - is there a known bug in this area? Anyone recognize
this problem? Of course, it could always be that the poster
screwed up....
-- 
Jonathan Clark
[NAC]!mtung!jhc

My walk has become rather more silly lately.