Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Proposed:  net.bixanon - for ex BIXen
Message-ID: <917@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 14-Nov-85 22:36:24 EST
Article-I.D.: lsuc.917
Posted: Thu Nov 14 22:36:24 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 15-Nov-85 06:49:53 EST
References: <197@circadia.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Distribution: net
Organization: Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
Lines: 23
Summary: What For?

In article <197@circadia.UUCP> dave@circadia.UUCP (David Messer) writes:
>I am just witnessing the demise of the Byte Information
>Exchange (BIX) because of the ridiculous rate structure.
>Is there any interest in a group for ex BIXen to meet?
>Are there any BIXen out there?
>-- 
>
>David Messer   UUCP:  ...ihnp4!circadia!dave
>               FIDO:  14/415 (SYSOP)


     Oh, come of it Dave, BIX isn't dead and anybody 'here' certainly
has nothing to complain about.  Read the latest (last?) issue of Creative
Computing.  Particularly David Ahl's last editorial.  There is an analogy.

                                         Cheers! -- Jim O.

-- 
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura
Compuserve: 72205,541
MTS at WU: GKL6