Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site oberon.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!oberon!blarson
From: blarson@oberon.UUCP (Bob Larson)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k,net.news.group,net.micro.6809
Subject: Re: Can the OS-9 traffic move out of net.micro.68K?
Message-ID: <154@oberon.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 13-Nov-85 19:20:39 EST
Article-I.D.: oberon.154
Posted: Wed Nov 13 19:20:39 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Nov-85 05:17:10 EST
References: <5100002@umn-cs.UUCP> <257@l5.uucp>
Reply-To: blarson@oberon.UUCP (Bob Larson)
Organization: U. of So. Calif., Los Angeles
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.micro.68k:1319 net.news.group:4566 net.micro.6809:607

Net.micro.68k is an aproprate place for discussion of os9/68000.
(Perhaps the info-68k mailing list would be better, but a number
of people interested in os9/68k do not get it.)  The only other 
processor os9 is available for is the 6809, os9/6809 discusssions 
should go in net.micro.6809.  I do not beleive there is enough
volume of os9 postings to require a separate group yet.  (Yes, I
would like one, but I don't think it yet meets the usenet group
creation requirements.)

Discussions of os9 on net.micro.atari and net.micro.amiga were 
inappropreate, but understandable.  (Followups should have been
redirected to net.micro.68k.  (Microware has not yet autorized 
anyone to port os9 to either the ST or the AMIGA.)

I will continue to post os9 messages to net.micro.6809, net.micro.68k,
and the info-68k mailing list as I feal the article warrents.

(Subscription request for info-68k should be sent to ucbvax!info-68k-request
or info-68k-request@berkely.edu)
-- 
Bob Larson
Arpa: Blarson@Usc-Ecl.Arpa
Uucp: {the (mostly unknown) world}!ihnp4!sdcrdcf!oberon!blarson
                 {several select chunks}!sdcrdcf!oberon!blarson