Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site calma.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!lll-crg!ucdavis!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!sun!calma!radzy
From: radzy@calma.UUCP (Tim Radzykewycz)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Can the OS-9 traffic move out of net.micro.68K?
Message-ID: <58@calma.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 14-Nov-85 13:09:00 EST
Article-I.D.: calma.58
Posted: Thu Nov 14 13:09:00 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Nov-85 08:05:55 EST
References: <5100002@umn-cs.UUCP> <257@l5.uucp> <500@harvard.ARPA>
Reply-To: radzy@calma.UUCP (Tim Radzykewycz)
Organization: GE/Calma Co., R&D Systems Engineering, Milpitas, CA
Lines: 23

In article <500@harvard.ARPA> kosower@harvard.UUCP (David A. kosower) writes:
>
>   I second this proposal.  I've tired of having my news cluttered
>with allegations that this toy operating system, running on a toy computer,
>is but ooooh-sooo-wonderful.  Grow up and start using a real OS!
>
>                  David A. Kosower

I have two things to say about this:
    1.  Mr. Kosower's flames ("grow up") are entirely unwarranted.
    2.  My feelings on the matter are:
		I don't care if OS-9 information is held in
		net.micro.68k or in net.micro.os9 or in
		net.os.os9, as long as it is there.  The 
		number of articles is relatively small (actually,
		I'd prefer if more people would post on it, but...)
Please don't try to kick OS-9 information off the net.  If you
would like there to be an OS-9 news group, please suggest *that*,
rather than just flaming about using some other OS.
-- 
Tim (radzy) Radzykewycz, The Incredible Radical Cabbage
	calma!radzy@ucbvax.ARPA
	{ucbvax,sun,csd-gould}!calma!radzy