Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site calma.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!gatech!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!amd!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!sun!calma!radzy
From: radzy@calma.UUCP (Tim Radzykewycz)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Can the OS-9 traffic move out of net.micro.68K?
Message-ID: <71@calma.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Nov-85 12:20:27 EST
Article-I.D.: calma.71
Posted: Fri Nov 22 12:20:27 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 25-Nov-85 06:47:47 EST
References: <5100002@umn-cs.UUCP> <257@l5.uucp> <500@harvard.ARPA> <58@calma.UUCP> <236@mplvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: radzy@calma.UUCP (Tim Radzykewycz)
Followup-To: /dev/null
Organization: GE/Calma Co., R&D Systems Engineering, Milpitas, CA
Lines: 23

In article <236@mplvax.UUCP> rec@mplvax.UUCP (Richard Currier) writes:
>In article <58@calma.UUCP> radzy@calma.UUCP (Tim Radzykewycz) writes:
>>Please don't try to kick OS-9 information off the net.  If you
>>would like there to be an OS-9 news group, please suggest *that*,
>>rather than just flaming about using some other OS.

>I assume, then, you really didn't mean it in your other posting when you seemed
>to approve of kicking the Macintosh information off the net. I have no inter-
>est in OS-9 but would not advocate dumping it just because I find no use for it.

Very sorry if I confused someone.  I definitely don't approve of sending
HEXDUMP, uuencode, crypt, BINHEX, or any other non-human-readable format.
But I have nothing against the MAC.

I do wish people would exercise restraint *in all postings*.

Since this isn't really appropriate for discussion on net.news.group, I've
directed all follups to /dev/null.  I wish other people would do that
sometimes.
-- 
Tim (radzy) Radzykewycz, The Incredible Radical Cabbage
	calma!radzy@ucbvax.ARPA
	{ucbvax,sun,csd-gould}!calma!radzy