Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!gds
From: gds@mit-eddie.UUCP (Greg Skinner)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Proposed deletion of Rich Rosen (AND MORE)
Message-ID: <576@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Nov-85 16:04:33 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.576
Posted: Wed Nov 27 16:04:33 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Nov-85 07:59:45 EST
References: <10108@tardis.UUCP> <949@unmvax.UUCP> <561@brl-sem.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: MIT Lusers and Hosers Inc., Cambridge, Ma.
Lines: 16

"Each site guru" does not necessarily have the authority to allow or
prevent people access to USENET.  Complaints about an individual's
postings should probably be directed to the management at the site and
not the SA.  The SA could speak to his management on behalf of
complainers that a user of the machine should be prevented from
accessing USENET, but I don't think (unless s/he has been specifically
given that power) s/he should be expected to take it upon his/her own to
determine access.  There might be a situation where the supervisor of an
SA is posting obnoxious articles -- what could the SA do in that case,
order his/her boss of the net?
-- 
It's like a jungle sometimes, it makes me wonder how I keep from goin' under.

Greg Skinner (gregbo)
{decvax!genrad, allegra, ihnp4}!mit-eddie!gds
gds@mit-eddie.mit.edu