Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.os
Message-ID: <942@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 29-Nov-85 07:59:51 EST
Article-I.D.: lsuc.942
Posted: Fri Nov 29 07:59:51 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Nov-85 10:00:22 EST
References: <2466@sjuvax.UUCP> <1594@utcsri.UUCP> <1859@watdcsu.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Distribution: net
Organization: Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
Lines: 20
Keywords: operating-systems news-groups
Summary: net.os.os9?

In article <1859@watdcsu.UUCP> haapanen@watdcsu.UUCP (Tom Haapanen [DCS]) writes:
>In article <1594@utcsri.UUCP> mason@utcsri.UUCP (Dave mason) writes:
>>I feel we need a net.os to discuss operating system topics.


     Yes, I'm not happy with the fact that it upsets people interested
in the 68000 processor when OS-9 people talk about OS-9.  The only thing
I'm worried about is whether adding a *lot* of news groups adds to system
overhead substantially in any way.  I believe we had a volunteer previously
to moderate an OS-9 group if necessary and/or provide archiving.  This
was a while back and I can't recall who.

                                           Cheers! -- Jim O.

-- 
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura
Compuserve: 72205,541
MTS at WU: GKL6