Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: As long as we are taliking about rmgrouping ...
Message-ID: <947@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 1-Dec-85 18:41:58 EST
Article-I.D.: lsuc.947
Posted: Sun Dec  1 18:41:58 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Dec-85 19:14:34 EST
References: <245@mit-eddie.UUCP> <136@vcvax1.UUCP> <548@tektools.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Organization: Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
Lines: 25
Summary: 'f'ollowup restricted to 1 group.

In article <548@tektools.UUCP> jerryp@tektools.UUCP (Jerry Peek) writes:
>In article <547@felix.UUCP> bytebug@felix.UUCP (Roger L. Long) writes:
>> 
>> Perhaps an answer to this would be to REQUIRE a "Followup-To" header
>> line listing one newsgroup when an article is posted to multiple
>> newsgroups.  This would require the author to choose what he thought
>> was the most appropriate newsgroup to continue the bulk of the
>> discussion.  Comments?

(Jerry stated his agreement.)
>
>--Jerry Peek, Tektronix, Inc.



     I agree also.  In fact, until recently I thought this was the way
it worked.

                                          Cheers! -- Jim O.
-- 
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura
Compuserve: 72205,541
MTS at WU: GKL6