Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttrdc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy
From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.unix-wizards,net.lan,net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.os
Message-ID: <617@ttrdc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Dec-85 23:06:14 EST
Article-I.D.: ttrdc.617
Posted: Tue Dec  3 23:06:14 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 5-Dec-85 07:48:22 EST
References: <2466@sjuvax.UUCP> <1594@utcsri.UUCP> <783@cyb-eng.UUCP> <101@humming.UUCP> <686@milo.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL
Lines: 22
Xref: watmath net.arch:2212 net.unix-wizards:15951 net.lan:1179 net.news.group:4762

In article <686@milo.UUCP>, rrr@milo.UUCP (Richard Rush) writes:
>> In article <783@cyb-eng.UUCP>, bc@cyb-eng.UUCP (Bill Crews) writes:
>> > > I feel we need a net.os to discuss operating system topics.  Right now
>> > > this is spread all over the net, mainly in heavily used groups like
>> > > unix-wizards.  Unix isn't everything, and even there it would be nice to
>> > > have a discussion not buried by discussion of bugs, etc.
>> > >
>> > > I said all this a couple of months ago, got about thirty responses,
>> > > only to be told "you didn't go about it the right way", which I think
>> > > is a little crazy to be told after the fact.  I now understand that the
>> > > right way to do it is to swamp the net.  So if you want net.os, use your
>> > > 'f' (not 'F') key NOW!
>
>YES FOR NET.OS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I SECOND THE MOTION!
-- 
 -------------------------------    Disclaimer:  The views contained herein are
|       dan levy | yvel nad      |  my own and are not at all those of my em-
|         an engihacker @        |  ployer or the administrator of any computer
| at&t computer systems division |  upon which I may hack.
|        skokie, illinois        |
 --------------------------------   Path: ..!ihnp4!ttrdc!levy