Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihnet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ihnet!eklhad
From: eklhad@ihnet.UUCP (K. A. Dahlke)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.physics,net.research
Subject: Re: Philip W. Anderson's Case Against Star Wars''
Message-ID: <330@ihnet.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 24-Nov-85 11:17:17 EST
Article-I.D.: ihnet.330
Posted: Sun Nov 24 11:17:17 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 25-Nov-85 06:54:12 EST
References: <131@decvax.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.politics:12141 net.physics:3633 net.research:359

> In academic physics departments,
> which receive relatively little support from the DOD, a pledge form has
> been circulating stating that the signer opposes SDI as unworkable and will not
> seek SDI funds; this has had a high percentage of signers ...
> Martin Minow

Can someone post the words of this pledge?
I would like to circulate a similar petition among the technical staff
here at AT&T.  Has such a petition been circulated throughout any
companies involved in government contracts?
If so, did it receive technical support?
Were any managers willing to sign?
Thanks.
-- 
	Nothing's worse than a dishwasher full of spotty dishes.
			Karl Dahlke    ihnp4!ihnet!eklhad