Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-kirk!williams
From: williams@kirk.DEC (John Williams 223-3402)
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Star Wars
Message-ID: <1593@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Dec-85 16:30:31 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.1593
Posted: Wed Dec  4 16:30:31 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Dec-85 15:04:23 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 13



	If you've read the latest Scientific American, the authors
pan Star Wars. I have found SA to be a reliable source of information.

	Myself, I think it's kinda stupid to design stuff that ultimately
consumes itself.

	Also, how about a detailed explanation why we didn't get involved
with Halley's comet? Methinks the government officials use cooperation
as a last resort.

						John