Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!dlo From: dlo@drutx.UUCP (OlsonDL) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: dollar economics Message-ID: <580@drutx.UUCP> Date: Thu, 14-Nov-85 12:52:54 EST Article-I.D.: drutx.580 Posted: Thu Nov 14 12:52:54 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 15-Nov-85 21:15:25 EST Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 57 [] In article <1120@jhunix.UUCP> ins_aprm@jhunix.UUCP (Paul R Markowitz) writes: >This is >further compounded by the fact that foreign companies are taking the money they >earn and are investing it in the US where they can get a better rate of return. I sincerely hope so! Do you really want that much needed investment taken away? Investment into the US economy means nice things like more jobs. Indeed, unemployment is still high, but it would be even worse without the investment. >Eventually, the dollar apreciated >significantly as a result of increased real interest rates due to the >profitability of US investments. The result is the current situation. But, that is circular logic. There is more to the value of the dollar than just getting more of them. And, I knew somebody would bring up "real interest rates" (I assume you mean subtracting inflation from the prime lending rate). Even if such a concept was valid, it does not account for the dollar's value. i.e. the differences between those percentages are about the same now as they were 5 years ago. >What needs to be >done is the accelerated depreciation allowance needs to be revoked in an >attempt to make investment in the US less attractive. Take away the life blood of the economy away! You have got to be kidding! Where do you think money for things like facilities and tools come from? Do you think that this money just falls from the sky? Besides, the more money invested by foreign countries, the less likely those countries will try to undermine the US economy, since that is where their money is. They would be cutting their own throats! >This will reduce the >upward pressure on the dollar and solve at least part of the problem. >The domestic economy may suffer a little for it but probably no more than it >already is suffering from huge increases in the money supply that are necessary >to pay interest to foreign investors. A few years ago, it was thought to be a bad thing that the US loaned so much money to foreign countries. Remember the concept of the "debt bomb"? Bad to loan money to others; bad for them to loan money to us. Interesting. Besides, after WWII, the US loaned massive amounts of money to Japan and Germany for rebuilding. They became huge debtor nations and have apparently done quite well thank you. Besides, even if what you said is true, how does that prove that devaluing the dollar will NOT make prices for the already expensive domestic goods even more expensive? >Paul Markowitz My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer. David Olson ..!ihnp4!drutx!dlo