Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ubc-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!ubc-vision!ubc-cs!robinson
From: robinson@ubc-cs.UUCP (Jim Robinson)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: US burial and armed strength:Re to Stalnaker
Message-ID: <103@ubc-cs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 19-Nov-85 19:00:08 EST
Article-I.D.: ubc-cs.103
Posted: Tue Nov 19 19:00:08 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Nov-85 02:37:15 EST
References: <756@whuxl.UUCP> <29200244@uiucdcs> <362@whuts.UUCP>
Reply-To: robinson@ubc-cs.UUCP (Jim Robinson)
Organization: UBC Department of Computer Science, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 14
Summary: 

In article <828@whuxl.UUCP> orb@whuxl.UUCP (SEVENER) writes:
>If the Soviet Union is so set upon "world conquest" why is it that
>they haven't invaded the small Communist countries of 
                                ^^^^^^^^^
>Rumania, Yugoslavia, and Albania for the past 40 years?
>Rumania had 30,000 people in a demonstration against missile deployments
>by both East and West.  Why hasn't the Soviet Union nuked Rumania yet?
>Since Rumania, Yugoslavia, and Albania are not members of NATO the
>USSR would have no opposition to attack from NATO forces in these
>countries.

One doesn't usually preach to the converted.

J.B. Robinson