Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!bbnccv!inmet!janw
From: janw@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Equality through Reaganomics ?
Message-ID: <7800701@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Nov-85 23:35:00 EST
Article-I.D.: inmet.7800701
Posted: Fri Nov 22 23:35:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Nov-85 21:02:17 EST
References: <7800672@inmet.UUCP>
Lines: 12
Nf-ID: #R:inmet:7800672:inmet:7800701:000:472
Nf-From: inmet!janw    Nov 22 23:35:00 1985


[patrick@ISM780B]
>Just goes to show, dunnit?  If all the women stayed home where they
>belong, there'd be no unemployment.  I mean, it stands to reason....

You are joking, of course, but there *are* a lot of people who
think that someone who gets a job (a woman, immigrant or whatever)
*takes* the job from others. On the contrary, anyone who holds
a productive job *makes* jobs for others. Thus, the more jobs
for women, the more jobs for *everyone*.

		Jan Wasilewsky