Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!think!inmet!janw
From: janw@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <7800726@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 23-Nov-85 19:41:00 EST
Article-I.D.: inmet.7800726
Posted: Sat Nov 23 19:41:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Nov-85 22:07:34 EST
References: <7559@ucla-cs.UUCP>
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:ucla-cs:-755900:inmet:7800726:177600:675
Nf-From: inmet!janw    Nov 23 19:41:00 1985


[Jim Balter (ima!jim)]
>The fact is that it is the U.S. that  is  totally  isolated  from
>world  opinion  concerning Nicaragua, and that rejects the Conta-
>dora process.

You are out of date on both points.

>The main question that we should really be
>concerned with is, does the U.S. have the right to destroy the
>government and the people of the sovereign nation of Nicaragua?

"Destroy the *people*" - does not deserve an answer.
"Destroy the government" ?  - Depends on the means employed.

Having sold the Nicaraguan people down the river with its aid to
the Sandinistas, the US has an OBLIGATION to at least match that
with aid to the resistance.

		Jan Wasilewsky