Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-hector.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!harvard!think!mit-eddie!mit-hector!martillo From: martillo@mit-hector.UUCP (Yakim Martillo) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion.jewish,net.nlang.india Subject: Re: Middle East, Oil and the costs of Militarism Message-ID: <141@mit-hector.UUCP> Date: Sun, 17-Nov-85 09:31:17 EST Article-I.D.: mit-hect.141 Posted: Sun Nov 17 09:31:17 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 19-Nov-85 01:47:17 EST References: <460@mhuxm.UUCP> <740@whuxl.UUCP> <10822@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: martillo@mit-hector.UUCP (Yakim Martillo) Organization: MIT Project Athena Lines: 41 Xref: lsuc net.politics:2028 net.religion.jewish:1560 net.nlang.india:444 >> >> been or are under Islamic subjugation, might have some legitimate grievances >> against the Islamic world and that they might have some legitimate claims >> for compenstation for Islamic mistreatment. >> > >The following identity is FALSE : > >Muslim = Arab = Anti-semitic = Anti-israel > >However, it is conveniently used by political demagogues to >further their own agenda. Since I never made the equation, this particular reply is a particularly slimy attempt to avoid a legitimate issue. A system like Islam may have bad aspects. In India for example caste and the suttee have been in the past part of the system of Hinduism. Criticism of such practices is legitimate. Calling criticism of such practices bigotry or illegtimate is pure intellectual cowardice or dishonesty. Since most Muslims and Jews who debate middle eastern issues constantly engage in intellectual dishonesty, I am unsurprised that such intellectual dishonesty has resurfaced. I personally have no interest in European Jewish Zionism and consider it basically a wrong-headed and disgusting movement (although not nearly as wrong-headed and disgusting as Arab Nationalism or Islamic Fundamentalism). Once European Intellectuals had the courage to attack shibboleths and oppose the crudities of, say, pre-Enlightenment Christianity. People like Hobbes, Lockes, Montesquiue, Rousseau, Voltaire, Montaigne etc. demanded change. I consider myself in this tradition. There will be no peace in the Middle East until there are some fundamental changes in Islamic attitudes, nor do Muslims have any right to claim rights such as national self-determination until they show some ability to live on terms of mutual respect and equality with the non-Muslim minorities who live among them.