Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site pyrnj.uucp
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!lll-crg!seismo!caip!topaz!pyrnj!romain
From: romain@pyrnj.uucp (Romain Kang)
Newsgroups: net.unix,net.rumor
Subject: Re: Looks like AT&T is leaving DEC owners in the cold!
Message-ID: <134@pyrnj.uucp>
Date: Wed, 27-Nov-85 18:06:11 EST
Article-I.D.: pyrnj.134
Posted: Wed Nov 27 18:06:11 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Nov-85 21:49:20 EST
References: <2073@aecom.UUCP> <191@gould9.UUCP> <40@brl-tgr.ARPA> <29@pixdoc.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp, Woodbridge, NJ
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.unix:6418 net.rumor:1166
Summary: GENERIC

Or could it be that they're trying to avoid accusations of favorable
treatment towards DEC?  For boxes other than AT&T's and DEC's, the
System V port has always been left up to vendors, who submit their
ports to AT&T for validation.  Now SV.3 has become a generic System V
which is defined by its behavior on AT&T's own boxes.  This will open
support on DEC machines to a System V equivalent of Mt Xinu
(Unisoft?).  Or even (shudder) DEC if they care to do so.
-- 

Romain Kang, Pyramid Technology Corporation

US Mail:	900 Route 9, Woodbridge, NJ  07095
Ma Bell:	(201) 750-2626
UUCPnet:	{allegra,cmcl2,pyramid,topaz}!pyrnj!romain

"Eggheads unite! You have nothing to lose but your yolks!" -Adlai Stevenson