Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rti-sel.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!rti-sel!wfi
From: wfi@rti-sel.UUCP (William Ingogly)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: yuppies
Message-ID: <553@rti-sel.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Nov-85 17:31:45 EST
Article-I.D.: rti-sel.553
Posted: Fri Nov 22 17:31:45 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Nov-85 06:19:32 EST
References: <2079@reed.UUCP> <522@rti-sel.UUCP> <13@ttidcc.UUCP> <537@rti-sel.UUCP> <18@ttidcc.UUCP> <548@rti-sel.UUCP> <25@ttidcc.UUCP>
Reply-To: wfi@rti-sel.UUCP (William Ingogly)
Organization: Research Triangle Institute, NC
Lines: 18
Summary: 

In article <25@ttidcc.UUCP> hollombe@ttidcc.UUCP (The Polymath) writes:

>Peace!  I have no disagreement with any of the above.  Perhaps  we've  been
>angrily agreeing with each other?  At least we're not very far apart.
>...
>Perhaps I misunderstood  what  your  article  was  saying.  The
>general  comment  I refered to was my description of what the word "yuppie"
>brought  to  mind...
>I don't like stereotypes much myself, especially as I fall under several of
>them.  Nevertheless, the yuppie stereotype exists ...
>I'm  sorry  if  I offended you or anyone else with my response.  I
>don't personally know anyone who fits that description ...

Agreed, Jerry. I don't really think we disagree much on this issue at
all, and think there may have been misunderstanding on both sides
(what, ME make a mistake??? :-). Peace to you, too.

                          -- Cheers, Bill Ingogly