Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site stolaf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!stolaf!knutsonk
From: knutsonk@stolaf.UUCP (Kari E. Knutson)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: emotions and your so
Message-ID: <4999@stolaf.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 25-Nov-85 15:35:58 EST
Article-I.D.: stolaf.4999
Posted: Mon Nov 25 15:35:58 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Nov-85 23:38:12 EST
References: <382@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: St. Olaf College, Northfield MN
Lines: 23

> Women would be 
> uninteresting without the emotion and the spontaneity (I don't think it
> would "drive me up a wall")....and I would hope that women feel the same way 
> about men (women, do you prefer "logical" and "practical" types?). 
> Of course I've never been married so....
>

You are so right. Men also would be pretty uninteresting without
emotion and spontaneity. What *I* look for is a bit of a happy medium.
I suppose that's asking too much...:-)

My last two SO's were absolute opposites. One was an incredibly "logical"
and "practical" person--we eventually stopped seeing each other because
of his inability to interact socially. The other was a totally zany, 
spur-of-the-moment person, yet knew little of anything outside his
computer terminal.  I guess this means that I consider a balance between
emotion and logic very important. I like a "walk on the wild side," but
practicality is nice in manageable amounts :-).

So does this explain why I've always had a crush on Mr. Spock?

Kari Knutson
...ihnp4!stolaf!knutsonk