Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site sunybcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!sunybcs!ugzannin
From: ugzannin@sunybcs.UUCP (Adrian Zannin)
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: Re: undershirts
Message-ID: <2548@sunybcs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 24-Nov-85 19:39:34 EST
Article-I.D.: sunybcs.2548
Posted: Sun Nov 24 19:39:34 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 25-Nov-85 08:11:04 EST
References: <2555@ut-ngp.UTEXAS> <695@hou2g.UUCP> <346@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Organization: SUNY/Buffalo Computer Science
Lines: 27

> *** YOUR MESSAGE ***
> 
> > And have you noticed that when Kirk's shirt gets ripped (as it is 
> > wont to do), you don't see any trace of the aforementioned undershirt?  
> > I don't recall ever seeing one of the cast in JUST an undershirt.
> 
> In "The Deadly Years," we learn that Kirk definitely doesn't wear an
> undershirt.  He's in his quarters and calls the bridge to inquire about
> the comet for the second time.  In "The Corbomite Maneuver," we learn
> that he also doesn't shower after heavy exercise before putting on his
> shirt (that sick bay scene has always bothered me).
> 
> However, in "The Naked Time," we learn that Spock definitely does where
> an undershirt and it's black.  Again, the scene is sickbay after he and
> Joe beam up from the frozen planet.  I believe this shirt is also visible
> during the surgery scene in "Journey to Babel."

I was under the impression tha it is *always* visible.  I thought that the
black "collar" on the uniform was just the shirt underneath.  Watch "The
Naked Time" again and watch when Spock puts his shirt back on.  Anybody
with a VCR out there that can prove/disprove this?
-- 
     Adrian Zannin
..{allegra,bbncca,decvax,dual,rocksvax,watmath,sbcs}!sunybcs!ugzannin
CSNET:    ugzannin@Buffalo.CSNET
ARPANET:  ugzannin%Buffalo@csnet-relay.ARPA
BITNET:   ugzannin@sunybcs.BITNET