Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mmm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!stolaf!mmm!cipher
From: cipher@mmm.UUCP (Andre Guirard)
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: Yet Another Inconsistency (disintegration chambers)
Message-ID: <338@mmm.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 28-Nov-85 15:15:40 EST
Article-I.D.: mmm.338
Posted: Thu Nov 28 15:15:40 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Nov-85 22:01:38 EST
References: <50000007@hpfclo.UUCP>
Reply-To: cipher@mmm.UUCP (Andre Guirard)
Organization: 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn.
Lines: 18
Summary: 

In article <50000007@hpfclo.UUCP> rodean@hpfcla.UUCP writes:
>For the first half or so of the episode, they refered to the devices
>that killed 'casualties' as a 'disintegration machine'. For the
>remainder of the time, it was called a 'disintegration chamber'. Seems
>pretty stupid to me that they couldn't get the script straight.

I know!  Isn't it terrible how some people will call a cylindrical
container used for drinking fluids from a "cup", and then later on
they'll come right back and call it a "glass"?  Or they'll ask where
the "restroom" is and then later on call it the "bathroom"?

Their scriptwriters should be chastised! ;-)
-- 

 /''`\						Andre Guirard
([]-[])						De Tuss from de Tonn
 \ o /						ihnp4!mmm!cipher
  `-'