Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site whuts.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuts!6243tes
From: 6243tes@whuts.UUCP (STERKEL)
Newsgroups: net.travel
Subject: Eperanto, the aggressor language.
Message-ID: <403@whuts.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Nov-85 14:25:32 EST
Article-I.D.: whuts.403
Posted: Wed Nov 27 14:25:32 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Nov-85 07:55:32 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 19

The current postings on Esperanto, finally got me 
motivated to look into it as a viable language.
I consider myself as a mediocre language user in 
all languages, just enough to get along.

Found a comprehensive U.S. Army manual FM 30-101-1,
1962, (AGO 4300B) on Esperanto, titled "Esperanto,
the Aggressor Language" (hence the subject of this 
posting.

My comment is:  YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING. Esperanto
appears to have incorporated the worst and most 
aggrevating problems from all languages (actually
European). I'll stumble through my faulty German,
Spanish, or use the guide books, thank-you.
-- 
[opinions are obviously only my own;     Terry
 not necessarily those of my asso-       ihnp4!whuts!6243tes
 ciates or those of my employer.]        cornet 232-2899