Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsb Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!render From: render@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU Newsgroups: net.tv Subject: Re: "Master Harold and the Boys" Message-ID: <12300045@uiucdcsb> Date: Wed, 20-Nov-85 20:52:00 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.12300045 Posted: Wed Nov 20 20:52:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 23-Nov-85 00:59:13 EST References: <2236@umcp-cs.UUCP> Lines: 28 Nf-ID: #R:umcp-cs.UUCP:2236:uiucdcsb:12300045:000:1597 Nf-From: uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU!render Nov 20 19:52:00 1985 Written 9:39 pm Nov 18, 1985 by leeper@mtgzz.UUCP: > I think that it was more effective as a television performance than it > would be as a stage play (heresy, I know). I think that you would lose > much of the facial expression seeing it as a play. I saw SWEENEY TODD > twice on the stage and once on cable. It was best on the cable for > the same reason. Not having seen this particular play, I agree that television does seem to serve as a better medium for portraying certain types of plays than does the stage. While on the subject, did anyone other than me see the televised version of "Death of a Salesman" with Dustin Hoffman? I thought it was incredible, yet no one else even mentioned it to the best of my recollection. I would hold this up as one example of an excellent blending the power of the close-up for isolating and intensifying a scene's emotional impact along with the stage technique of using the limited backgrounds for abstracting the visual quality of a scene. I wonder how much the tone of the play would change, however, given that all the dialogue must be spoken loud enough to reach the back of the theatre? Perhaps someone who has seen the play on stage as well as the televised production could comment. Hal Render, a non-supercomputing Illini University of Illinois (It ain't much to look at, but it sure is flat) {pur-ee, ihnp4} ! uiucdcs ! render render@uiuc.csnet render@uiuc.arpa