Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site wdl1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!amd!pesnta!hplabs!fortune!wdl1!jbn
From: jbn@wdl1.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Pre-fetch
Message-ID: <872@wdl1.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 20-Nov-85 03:18:21 EST
Article-I.D.: wdl1.872
Posted: Wed Nov 20 03:18:21 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 23-Nov-85 10:41:09 EST
Sender: notes@wdl1.UUCP
Organization: Ford Aerospace, Western Development Laboratories
Lines: 30
Nf-ID: #R:bunker:-89100:wdl1:64000032:000:1706
Nf-From: wdl1!jbn    Nov 19 18:38:00 1985

> Back in the dark ages when I was learning assembly language
> programming on a CDC 6400 we were warned about this problem
> (pre-fetch also forces you to be careful for *shudder* self-modifying code.)
> 
> The 6000 series machines have base-and-limit-register memory management
> and 60-bit words with 15 or 30 bit instructions.
> After the first instruction of a word is executed, the machine prefetches
> the next word into the instruction buffer.
> If you are in the last word:  Bang, you're dead.

      It was worse than that; the CDC 6400 was the economy model; the CDC
6600 had TEN instruction look-ahead, and, reasonably enough, one could
get a protection fault by executing code within ten words of the memory
lockout limits.  Worse, this effect was intermittent, because the machine
was asynchronous; sometimes the jump instruction would cut off the lookahead
before it reached the memory limits, and sometimes the lookahead would get
there first; results varied from CPU to CPU, depending on exact wire lengths
and gate delays.  Repeatability was never a strong point of the CDC 6600.
With three million discrite components, (this was before ICs) the CDC 6600 
goes down in history as the all-time winner on parts count.
      Semour did learn from his experience with this monster; the Cray I
was a strictly synchronous machine, with parity checking (Semour used to
say ``parity is for farmers'', but learned better.)
      No, I never used one of these things; I was in junior high when it
came out, but one should have some sense of history.  It's worth realizing
that some of the many-register RISC machines are likely to have the same 
problems with the lookahead logic.

					John Nagle