Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site megatek.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!amd!pesnta!pyramid!gould9!ncr-sd!sdcc6!megatek!template
From: template@megatek.UUCP (Template)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.unix-wizards,net.lan,net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.os
Message-ID: <103@megatek.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 21-Nov-85 14:37:56 EST
Article-I.D.: megatek.103
Posted: Thu Nov 21 14:37:56 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Nov-85 07:22:25 EST
References: <2466@sjuvax.UUCP> <1594@utcsri.UUCP> <268@ucdavis.UUCP> <760@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Megatek Corp., San Diego
Lines: 6
Xref: watmath net.arch:2145 net.unix-wizards:15827 net.lan:1166 net.news.group:4677
Summary: yes to net.os

> I feel we need a net.os to discuss operating system topics.  Right now
> this is spread all over the net, mainly in heavily used groups like
> unix-wizards.  Unix isn't everything, and even there it would be nice to
> have a discussion not buried by discussion of bugs, etc.
> 
  Here is my vote for net.os.