Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!lll-crg!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn <gwyn>)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: ptrace child after fork?
Message-ID: <169@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 29-Nov-85 03:40:03 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.169
Posted: Fri Nov 29 03:40:03 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 30-Nov-85 06:50:06 EST
References: <755@rtech.UUCP> <28500055@ISM780B.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 5

> My SVID describes this in appendix 3.0 (K_EXT), under "Effect on BASE ..."
> I can't say I think it's a good idea, but that IS what the SVID says (sigh).

Gaak, you're right.  The SVR2 fork(2) and exec(2) manual pages
say the same thing.  What a lossage.