Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site hammer.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!lll-crg!ucdavis!ucbvax!decvax!tektronix!orca!hammer!seifert From: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy) Newsgroups: net.video Subject: Re: The Fate of Beta Format Message-ID: <1670@hammer.UUCP> Date: Sat, 30-Nov-85 01:01:29 EST Article-I.D.: hammer.1670 Posted: Sat Nov 30 01:01:29 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 5-Dec-85 04:25:35 EST References: <703@leadsv.UUCP> <1666@hammer.UUCP> <1912@orca.UUCP> Reply-To: tekecs!doghouse.TEK!snoopy Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm Lines: 49 In article <1912@orca.UUCP> andrew@orca.UUCP (Andrew Klossner) writes: >"Why would RCA spend the bucks for developing stereo CED disks and >interactive (mucho special effects) if they planned on dumping the >format?" A few differences here, CED was a braindamaged idea to start with. It never did very well. You don't even see that much laser disk stuff in stores. (why this is would make an interesting discussion) Of the two disk formats, the technically superior system won. >more of their work into 8mm and less emphasis on Beta. When 8mm >quality reaches Beta quality (and it will -- analogy with audio tape >reel-to-reel vs cassette; they stopped improving RtR quality but >continued pushing cassette quality to parity) But RtR is (1) more difficult than a cassette (2) more expensive, both for machine and for tape (3) physically larger (both machine and tape) (4) hard to have auto and portable machines that use the same tape as your home machine. Besides, RtR is still around, you just don't see the low-end stuff anymore. Beta, VHS, and 8mm are all cassettes => easy to handle. 8mm's size may be a factor for camcorders, but Beta/VHS home machines are down to normal component size. (for large libraries tape size and cost could be a factor) Sure, 8mm will get to the point that Beta is now, but the same tricks can be used to make Beta even better. Only when 8mm becomes so good that further improvement isn't needed will Beta become obsolete. By no further improvement needed, I mean that an n-th generation tape (say n=4) produces a perfect, high-resolution picture on a projection TV, with at least two high fidelity sound tracks (4 would be better). Granted they may drop Beta before it get quite this far, but on the other hand they may not. TV is finally getting into the high performance bit, after years of being "good enough". People are buying monitors and projection TVs, and they want a very good picture. Another factor is that there is A LOT of Beta gear already out there, so there will be a continuing demand for Beta products for a long time. Snoopy tektronix!tekecs!doghouse.TEK!snoopy