Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!felix!scgvaxd!trwrb!sdcrdcf!barryg
From: barryg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Lee Gold)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.legal
Subject: Re: Problems (legal and otherwise) w/name changes on marriage
Message-ID: <2460@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Nov-85 10:57:19 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.2460
Posted: Fri Nov 15 10:57:19 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 30-Nov-85 06:24:11 EST
References: <912@lsuc.UUCP>
Reply-To: barryg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Lee Gold)
Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica
Lines: 8
Xref: watmath net.women:8201 net.legal:2600

I don't know if this was the law or merely Merrill Lynch's practice, but
back in 1965 (California) I was informed that Merrill Lynch wouldn't
act as my agent to sell stocks I'd been given as a minor without a consent
form from my husband, because I'd filed a change of name to my married
name on the stock certificate -- even though the stocks had never been
commingled with my married property.

--Lee Gold