Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!telecom From: telecom@ucbvax.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.telecom Subject: calling party ID Message-ID: <8512261256.2947.0.VT1.00C@vortex.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Dec-85 15:56:38 EST Article-I.D.: vortex.8512261256.2947.0.VT1.00C Posted: Thu Dec 26 15:56:38 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Dec-85 18:14:35 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 50 Approved: telecom@mit-xx.arpa Yes, there are some LOCAL trials. Yes, there are specs for collecting such info from CCIS data. But there are also some reasons why widespread availability in any USEFUL form won't be around for quite awhile: 1) In at least one local trial, users could BLOCK their calls from being ID'd. This could only be bypassed by dialing a special code which would record the calling party's number AT THE CO. The info would only be made available if the called party made an official complaint and filed a police report regarding obscene or harrassing calls, and even then the police would get the number, not the called party. There was also a hefty per-use charge for this service. Ya' see, there are interesting privacy issues involved. You may think it's OK for you to get the numbers of everyone who calls you. But do you think it's OK for businesses to COLLECT that info from random inquiry calls and use it to make up telephone "mailing lists" for future advertising, perhaps by automated calling equipment? And exactly WHAT GOOD does getting a random phone number for an obnoxious calling business really do you? Odds are it will be some random trunk on some random unlisted circuit. To DO anything with it, you'd have to file all of the official complaints and paperwork--and in such a case the odds are that YOUR having the number (it's probably a dial-out only trunk anyway, so you can't even call it!) won't do you much more good than if the number was only recorded for official investigative use by the appropriate authorities. But keep in mind, if you can see other people's numbers, they (including businesses) can see yours. And the odds are that the businesses will tend to make much greater use of this info than you as an individual will do. Individuals tend to have simple dialin/out trunks, but businesses, especially telephone solicitation types, tend to have numbers that you CAN'T CALL BACK. You'll have to rely on the authorities to take action-- I hope you like red tape. 2) Before the Bell breakup, I would have predicted widespread CCIS implementation. But with the masses of bizarre carriers, WATS resellers, "tin can and string" operations, etc., I suspect that the number of calls that will not be passing useful calling number information will remain very high. 3) People often suggest that calling party number ID will end obscene and harrassing phone calls. Well, I doubt it, unless we ban pay phones at the same time. --Lauren--