Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!jbs
From: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jeff Siegal)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.unix-wizards,net.lan,net.news.group
Subject: Why is net.os taking so long?
Message-ID: <730@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Dec-85 00:19:38 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.730
Posted: Fri Dec 13 00:19:38 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Dec-85 03:53:46 EST
References: <783@cyb-eng.UUCP> <512@smeagol.UUCP>
Reply-To: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jeff Siegal)
Distribution: net
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 12
Xref: watmath net.arch:2278 net.unix-wizards:16092 net.lan:1195 net.news.group:4826

In article <512@smeagol.UUCP> kwan@smeagol.UUCP (Richard_Kwan) writes:
>Good grief... are we still tallying votes?
>YES FOR NET.OS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I agree.  This is silly.  If net.os is going to get created, then
lets have it already.  If not, then I'll set up a mailing-list so we
can stop sending noise (like "One more vote for net.os....I agree,
let's have a net.os....etc....etc....etc..") around the world, and
start sending some os-related information.

	In a foolhardy attempt to improve the S/N ratio,
	Jeff Siegal - MIT EECS (jbs@mit-eddie)