Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site homxb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!homxb!gemini
From: gemini@homxb.UUCP (Rick Richardson)
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: Unix w/o Memory Mgt.; what the IBM PC could have been
Message-ID: <1034@homxb.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Dec-85 21:45:07 EST
Article-I.D.: homxb.1034
Posted: Wed Dec 18 21:45:07 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Dec-85 02:11:56 EST
References: <1825@peora.UUCP>, <3836@ut-sally.UUCP>
Organization: PC Research, Inc.
Lines: 12

>Jim Crandell, C. S. Dept., The University of Texas at Austin writes:
>In article <1825@peora.UUCP> jer@peora.UUCP (J. Eric Roskos) writes:
>>  Basically, you could have partitioned the memory, using the
>>segment registers as base registers, assumed a fixed 64K bound on process
>>size, and written your compilers using the small memory model.
>
>Congratulations.  You've just invented PC/IX.

Nope, you invented Venix/86.  PC/IX didn't arrive for several more months.

Rick Richardson, PC Research, Inc. (201) 922-1134
..!ihnp4!houxm!castor!{rer,pcrat!rer} <--Replies to here, not to homxb!!!