Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site hpfcll.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!psuvax1!burdvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hpfcdc!hpfcla!rjs
From: rjs@hpfcla.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: Re: IOCALL Benchmark results
Message-ID: <42200001@hpfcll.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Dec-85 23:54:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hpfcll.42200001
Posted: Wed Dec  4 23:54:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Dec-85 04:48:25 EST
References: <350@ncr-sd.UUCP>
Organization: 04 Dec 85 21:54:00 MST
Lines: 7

Is this really a valid benchmark? What about systems that use disc
caching techniques. If the cache sizes are different then the comparison
may not necessarily be fair.

Bob Schneider
Hewlett-Packard (Fort Collins)
ihnp4!hpfcla!rjs