Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site pedsgd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!petrus!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hjuxa!petsd!pedsgd!bob
From: bob@pedsgd.UUCP (Robert A. Weiler)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: LOW COST CD PLAYER
Message-ID: <387@pedsgd.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Dec-85 12:00:59 EST
Article-I.D.: pedsgd.387
Posted: Mon Dec 30 12:00:59 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Dec-85 23:45:02 EST
References: <446@tekcbi.UUCP> <200@birtch.UUCP>
Reply-To: bob@pedsgd.UUCP (Robert A. Weiler,7343)
Distribution: na
Organization: CONCURRENT Computer Corp, Tinton Falls, NJ
Lines: 21

Organization : CONCURRENT Computer Corp, Tinton Falls NJ
Keywords: 

In article <200@birtch.UUCP> oleg@birtch.UUCP (Oleg Kiselev) writes:
>
>Ever seen ANYTHING good made by Sharp? 
>
>I didn't think so.... Sharp, Emerson, SoundDesign, other Kmart and 
>Zodys brands are aimed at the people who don't know (or care) about
>anything better.
>-- 

Ok - I confess I own a Sharp (1044 ? some model or other) cassette
deck of about 1979 vintage. And it has worked just fine for 6
years and 3 moves. To be sure it has limitations; no high frequency
response, Dolby B only. But until recently it made better tapes
than prerecorded ones and if it were not for CD's, which it cant
cope with, I would not be looking to replace it. I think I got
my 100 dollars worth out of it. Remember there is more to buying
stereo gear than knowing or caring about good sound - there is
being able to afford it.