Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gcc-milo.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!pesnta!amd!amdcad!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!gcc-milo!john
From: john@gcc-milo.ARPA (John Allred)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.auto
Subject: Re: Massachusetts seat belt law
Message-ID: <409@gcc-milo.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 18-Dec-85 09:26:46 EST
Article-I.D.: gcc-milo.409
Posted: Wed Dec 18 09:26:46 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Dec-85 01:22:48 EST
References: <294@frog.UUCP> <751@mit-eddie.UUCP> <394@unccvax.unccvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: john@gcc-milo.UUCP (John Allred)
Distribution: net
Organization: General Computer Company, Cambridge Ma
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.politics:12595 net.auto:8855

In article <394@unccvax.unccvax.UUCP> dsi@unccvax.UUCP (Dataspan Inc) writes:
>
>     Seat belt laws are trivial.  It could be much worse.  You could have
>to demonstrate your proficiency on a skidpad, or have your vehicle impounded
>for piss-poor mechanical maintainence.
>
>David Anthony
>DataSpan, Inc

Skidpad proficiency *should* be required!  If the general population could
maneuver a ton or so of metal in non-ideal conditions, there would be many more
people alive today, and far fewer idiots driving.

-- 
John Allred
General Computer Company 
uucp: seismo!harvard!gcc-milo!john