Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!minow From: minow@decvax.UUCP (Martin Minow) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.auto Subject: Re: Massachusetts seat belt law Message-ID: <147@decvax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 23-Dec-85 11:38:43 EST Article-I.D.: decvax.147 Posted: Mon Dec 23 11:38:43 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 24-Dec-85 20:48:24 EST References: <294@frog.UUCP> <751@mit-eddie.UUCP> <8110@ucla-cs.ARPA> <146@decvax.UUCP> <518@sdchema.sdchema.UUCP> Reply-To: minow@decvax.UUCP (Martin minow) Organization: DEC - ULTRIX Engineering Group Lines: 39 Xref: lsuc net.politics:2611 net.auto:1143 Continuing my comments on the Swedish seatbelt law study: >>Two studies were done in Sweden in the early/mid 1970's. One >>carefully estimated the total cost to society of "cleaning up" >>after a traffic fatality (exclusive of insurance payments, .... >>In round numbers, cleaning up the mess costs about $50,000 per accident. > Was this for fatalities only involving non-usage of seat-belts or > was it for all fatal accidents? All fatal accidents. >What I would like to know is how many of those 131 fatalities were >caused BECAUSE the people did not buckle up. The statistics are >valid only if use of seat-belts would have helped in any way. I don't remember reading an answer to this question. The odds still look like 60:1 against you if you don't buckle up. (Naive estimate, no math complaints, please.) Anecdotal evidence that someone "would have been killed if he wasn't thrown clear" are just that: the is no way to check this. >I presume that studies examining "every fatal accident" (with Volvos or >otherwise) would prob'ly include accidents of the latter type also, where >fatalities were not a direct consequence of not using seat-belts. Is that >correct? > Sameer Nadkarni > sdcsvax!sdchema!svn I've been in two accidents wearing seat belts, one in a micro-car (Fiat 850) that I drove off the road to avoid a more serious collision. No injuries in either. Being restrained by the seat belt enabled me to maintain control of the car, steering it off the road (and avoiding a tree). Without the seat belt, I believe I would have been tossed around by the first bump and consequently have lost total control of the situation. Martin Minow decvax!minow