Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bbncc5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!bbnccv!bbncc5!sdyer
From: sdyer@bbncc5.UUCP (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: net.motss,net.books,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: Should book ads disclose sexual slant?
Message-ID: <694@bbncc5.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 29-Dec-85 22:03:39 EST
Article-I.D.: bbncc5.694
Posted: Sun Dec 29 22:03:39 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Dec-85 17:45:44 EST
References: <4729@hlexa.UUCP> <205@globetek.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 12
Keywords: "Thanks, but save it for your shrink" dept.
Xref: lsuc net.motss:456 net.books:1218 net.sf-lovers:5609

I think Christine Robertson (globetek!chris) said it as well as anyone
could.  Actually, I'm glad this guy brought Delaney's book up, because I
just purchased it, taking a chance that I remembered its mention a long
long time ago here on net.motss.  On the other hand, I wasn't SURE that
this was the book, and given my aversion to SF in general, and the fact
that the cover really didn't say much about its "orientation", I was afraid
myself that I would have to wade through (shudder) pages of straight sex 
as well as SF writing! :-)  Talk about being cheated out of $3.95!
-- 
/Steve Dyer
dyer@harvard.harvard.edu
harvard!dyer